What Were The Problems With The Sykes-Picot Agreement Of 1916

Posted by in Uncategorized

On April 21, Faisal left for the East. Before leaving, Clemenceau sent a draft letter on April 17 in which the French government declared that it recognized “Syria`s right to independence in the form of a federation of autonomous governments in accordance with the traditions and desires of the population,” claiming that Faisal had recognized “that France is the qualified power to give Syria the help of various advisers, which are necessary to create order and achieve the progress demanded by the population. the Syrian population” and the 20. April assured Faisal Clemenceau that he was “deeply impressed by the altruistic kindness of your statements to me while I was in Paris, and must thank you for being the first to propose the deployment of the Inter-Ally Commission, which will soon leave for the East to determine the wishes of the local peoples regarding the future organization of their country. I am sure the Syrian people will know how to show you their gratitude. [95] As a result of the Sazonov-Palaiologos agreement included, Russia was to receive Western Armenia in addition to Constantinople and the Turkish Strait, which had already been promised in the Constantinople Agreement of 1915. [8] Italy increased the agreement in 1917 by the Treaty of Saint-Jean-de-Maurienne and received southern Anatolia. [8] The area of Palestine with an area smaller than later Mandatory Palestine was to fall under “international administration.” The Anglo-French statement was read in the minutes, with Pichon commenting that it showed the altruistic stance of both governments towards the Arabs and Lloyd George that it was “more important than all the old agreements.” [91] Pichon also referred to a contract proposal dated February 15 based on the private agreement between Clemenceau and Lloyd George last December. [91] (According to Lieshout, just before Faisal gave his presentation at the conference on the 6th, Clemenceau presented Lloyd George with a proposal that seems to deal with the same subject; Lieshout dated related British documents to the 6th, while the date is not documented in the protocol. [92]) It is clear that among the differences between 1916 and 2016 is the absence of an external power capable of imposing a solution – even if the international community agrees. .