The North American Free Trade Agreement Is An Example Of Which Of These
Before sending it to the U.S. Senate, Clinton added two subsidiary agreements, the North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation (NAALC) and the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation (NAAEC) to protect workers and the environment, as well as to allay the concerns of many members of the House of Representatives. The United States has required its partners to comply with similar environmental practices and regulations. [Citation required] After much attention and discussion, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act on November 17, 1993. Supporters of the deal included 132 Republicans and 102 Democrats. The legislation passed the Senate on November 20, 1993, 61-38.  The Supporters of the Senate were 34 Republicans and 27 Democrats. Republican Congressman David Dreier of California, a staunch supporter of NAFTA since the Reagan administration, has played a leading role in mobilizing support for the agreement among Republicans in Congress and across the country.   We must stop sending jobs abroad. It`s quite simple: if you pay $12, $13, $14 an hour for factory workers and you can move your factory south of the border, pay a dollar an hour for work…
don`t have health care — it`s the most expensive element in making a car — have no environmental control, no pollution control, no retirement, and you don`t care about anything but making money, there will be a huge absorbent sound going south. … If [Mexican] jobs go from a dollar an hour to six dollars an hour, and ours falls to six dollars an hour, and then they are ironed out again. But in the meantime, you have destroyed the country with such agreements.  One of the most affected agricultural sectors was the meat industry. In 2004, Mexico moved from a small player in the U.S. export market to the second largest importer of U.S. agricultural products, and NAFTA may have been an important catalyst for this change. Free trade has removed barriers to business between the two countries, allowing Mexico to offer a growing meat market in the United States and increase sales and profits for the meat industry in the United States. A simultaneous and dramatic increase in Mexican GDP per capita has significantly changed meat consumption patterns due to increased per capita meat consumption.  Under NAFTA, many small U.S.
companies depended on exporting their products to Canada or Mexico. According to the U.S. Trade Representative, this trade has supported more than 140,000 small and medium-sized enterprises in the United States.  According to a 2018 Sierra Club report, Canada`s NAFTA and Paris Agreement commitments have been met. The Paris commitments were voluntary and NAFTA was mandatory.  Supporters supported NAFTA because it opened up Mexican markets in the United States.